WNBA · Career comparison
Kiki Iriafen vs Natisha Hiedeman: who's better?
Dead even, 4–4. Every category below is scored on career per-game rates, so a longer career doesn't win on volume alone.
| Kiki Iriafen | Stat | Natisha Hiedeman |
|---|---|---|
| 14.2 | PTS / G | 8.4 |
| 9.0 | REB / G | 1.9 |
| 1.6 | AST / G | 2.8 |
| 49.8 | FG % | 42.3 |
| 29.4 | 3P % | 36.8 |
| 0.6 | STL / G | 0.8 |
| 0.3 | BLK / G | 0.1 |
| 71.9 | FT % | 75.7 |
| Context — shown, not scored | ||
| 81 | GP | 270 |
Pick the season, weight the stats that matter to you, and vote on who wins.