WNBA · Career comparison
Kiki Iriafen vs Natisha Hiedeman: who's better?
Kiki Iriafen
VS
Natisha Hiedeman
Dead even, 4–4. Every category below is scored on career per-game rates, so a longer career doesn't win on volume alone.
| Kiki Iriafen | Stat | Natisha Hiedeman |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 | PTS / G | 8.4 |
| 8.8 | REB / G | 1.9 |
| 1.6 | AST / G | 2.7 |
| 48.9 | FG % | 42.6 |
| 27.9 | 3P % | 37.0 |
| 0.6 | STL / G | 0.8 |
| 0.2 | BLK / G | 0.1 |
| 74.2 | FT % | 74.9 |
| Context — shown, not scored | ||
| 69 | GP | 265 |
Pick the season, weight the stats that matter to you, and vote on who wins.